<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ABANow - ABA Media Relations &#38; Communication Services &#187; e-Alerts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.abanow.org/category/releases/e-alerts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.abanow.org</link>
	<description>ABA Media Relations &#38; Communication Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:01:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ABA Offers Conclusions on Public Defender Workloads to Florida Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.abanow.org/2012/01/aba-offers-conclusions-on-public-defender-workloads-to-florida-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.abanow.org/2012/01/aba-offers-conclusions-on-public-defender-workloads-to-florida-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Defender Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida v. The State of Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standing Committee on Legal Aid and Indigent Defendants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abanow.org/?p=23019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CHICAGO, Jan. 4, 2012 – In an amicus brief filed in Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida v. The State of Florida, the American Bar Association offers its conclusions to the Florida Supreme Court on public defender ethical obligations when faced with excessive workloads. The brief takes no position on the factual arguments in the case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHICAGO, Jan. 4, 2012 – In an <a href="http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/amicus/public_defender_v_the_state_of_florida.authcheckdam.pdf">amicus brief</a> filed in <em>Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida v. The State of Florida,</em> the American Bar Association offers its conclusions to the Florida Supreme Court on public defender ethical obligations when faced with excessive workloads. The brief takes no position on the factual arguments in the case.</p>
<p>The brief focuses on two ABA documents, which are also provided in appendices:</p>
<ul>
<li>The ABA Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility&#8217;s Formal Opinion 06-441, &#8220;Ethical Obligations of Lawyers Who Represent Indigent Criminal Defendants When Excessive Caseloads Interfere With Competent and Diligent Representation,&#8221; and</li>
<li>The ABA Standing Committee on Legal Aid and Indigent Defendants&#8217; &#8220;Eight Guidelines of Public Defense Related to Excessive Workloads.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p>The ABA discusses how requiring proof of an actual ethical violation and injury to the client before awarding relief from an excessive caseload would effectively require a lawyer to breach the lawyer&#8217;s ethical duties to the client.</p>
<p>The ABA also maintains that requiring a showing that individual lawyers are providing inadequate representation would breach the public defense organization&#8217;s ethical obligations.</p>
<p>The brief is available online <a href="http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/amicus/public_defender_v_the_state_of_florida.authcheckdam.pdf">here</a>.</p>
<p>With nearly 400,000 members, the American Bar Association is the world&#8217;s largest voluntary professional membership organization. As the national voice of the legal profession, the ABA works to improve the administration of justice, promotes programs that assist lawyers and judges in their work, accredits law schools, provides continuing legal education, and works to build public understanding around the world of the importance of the rule of law.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">- 30 -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abanow.org/2012/01/aba-offers-conclusions-on-public-defender-workloads-to-florida-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABA Urges Department of Defense to Rescind New Guantanamo Bay Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.abanow.org/2011/12/aba-urges-department-of-defense-to-rescind-new-guantanamo-bay-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.abanow.org/2011/12/aba-urges-department-of-defense-to-rescind-new-guantanamo-bay-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney-client privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abanow.org/?p=22843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON, D.C., Dec. 22, 2011 — American Bar Association President Wm. T. (Bill) Robinson III urges Leon Panetta, U.S. Secretary of Defense, in a letter yesterday to rescind a new Guantanamo Bay policy that appears to violate attorney-client privilege.  Lawyers for detainees have reported that communications with their clients are being intercepted, reviewed by the government and in some cases shared with the prosecution team, Robinson said.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON, D.C., Dec. 22, 2011 — American Bar Association President Wm. T. (Bill) Robinson III urges Leon Panetta, U.S. Secretary of Defense, in a letter yesterday to rescind a new Guantanamo Bay policy that appears to violate attorney-client privilege.  Lawyers for detainees have reported that communications with their clients are being intercepted, reviewed by the government and in some cases shared with the prosecution team, Robinson said.</p>
<p>“The American justice system depends on the essential role of lawyers in counseling their clients,” Robinson said. “This includes providing zealous and effective counsel, even to those accused of heinous crimes against this nation and its people”</p>
<p>Robinson urges the Department of Defense to restore the confidentiality of communications between lawyers and Guantanamo detainees.</p>
<p>The letter is available <a href="http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/uncategorized/2011/gao/2011dec21_guantanamoattcltpriv.authcheckdam.pdf">here</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">- 30 -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abanow.org/2011/12/aba-urges-department-of-defense-to-rescind-new-guantanamo-bay-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABA Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar Changes Annual Law School Questionnaire</title>
		<link>http://www.abanow.org/2011/07/aba-section-of-legal-education-and-admissions-to-the-bar-changes-annual-law-school-questionnaire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.abanow.org/2011/07/aba-section-of-legal-education-and-admissions-to-the-bar-changes-annual-law-school-questionnaire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abanow.org/?p=18821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON, D.C., July 27, 2011 – The American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar today announced changes to the annual questionnaire sent to all ABA-Accredited Law Schools.  The changes will require that schools provide additional information on employment and placement of graduates after they receive a J.D. degree.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON, D.C., July 27, 2011 – The American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar today announced changes to the annual questionnaire sent to all ABA-Accredited Law Schools.  The changes will require that schools provide additional information on employment and placement of graduates after they receive a J.D. degree.</p>
<p>A statement from the section regarding these changes is available <a title="Changes to Law School Questionnaire" href="http://www.abanow.org/wordpress/wp-content/files_flutter/1311794682lawschool_employent_info_072711.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">- 30 -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abanow.org/2011/07/aba-section-of-legal-education-and-admissions-to-the-bar-changes-annual-law-school-questionnaire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABA Urges Supreme Court to Find Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel at the Criminal Plea Stage</title>
		<link>http://www.abanow.org/2011/07/aba-urges-supreme-court-to-find-right-to-effective-assistance-of-counsel-at-the-criminal-plea-stage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.abanow.org/2011/07/aba-urges-supreme-court-to-find-right-to-effective-assistance-of-counsel-at-the-criminal-plea-stage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABA Criminal Justice Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blaine Lafler v. Anthony Cooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of Missouri v. Galin Edward Frye]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abanow.org/?p=18749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CHICAGO, July 25, 2011 – The American Bar Association on Friday filed an amicus curiae brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in support of the respondents in the companion cases of Blaine Lafler v. Anthony Cooper and State of Missouri v. Galin Edward Frye. The ABA urges the court to uphold the lower courts' rulings that a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel at the plea stage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHICAGO, July 25, 2011<strong> </strong>– The American Bar Association on Friday filed an <em><a href="http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/amicus/frye_brief.authcheckdam.pdf">amicus curiae brief</a></em> with the U.S. Supreme Court in support of the respondents in the companion cases of <em>Blaine Lafler v. Anthony Cooper</em> and <em>State of Missouri v. Galin Edward Frye.</em> The ABA urges the court to uphold the lower courts&#8217; rulings that a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel at the plea stage.</p>
<p>In <em>Cooper,</em> the defendant rejected the government&#8217;s plea offer based on his lawyer&#8217;s incorrect advice on the standard for attempted murder and was convicted at trial. In <em>Frye,</em> the defendant&#8217;s lawyer failed to inform him of the government&#8217;s misdemeanor plea offer, after which the defendant pleaded guilty to a felony. Both defendants received sentences that were much higher than the plea offers.</p>
<p>Citing standards for competent representation in the <a href="http://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/model_rules_of_professional_conduct_table_of_contents.html">ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct</a> and the <a href="http://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/policy/standards.html">ABA Criminal Justice Standards</a>, the ABA argues that subsequent constitutionally sufficient proceedings<strong> </strong>– such as a fair trial in Cooper’s case or a court’s acceptance of a guilty plea in Frye’s case<strong> </strong>– do not remedy a violation of a defendant’s constitutional rights at the critical plea stage.</p>
<p>The brief also asserts that when ineffective assistance causes a defendant to lose the benefit of an advantageous plea bargain, the court should have discretion to fashion a remedy that is reasonably calculated to place the defendant insofar as possible in the position he would have been in had his Sixth Amendment rights not been violated.</p>
<p>&#8220;The fact that nearly 95% of criminal convictions now result from guilty pleas makes it all the more important that defendants considering a guilty plea should have competent counsel,&#8221; the brief states.</p>
<p>The brief is available <a href="http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/amicus/frye_brief.authcheckdam.pdf">here</a>.</p>
<p>With nearly 400,000 members, the American Bar Association is the world&#8217;s largest voluntary professional membership organization. As the national voice of the legal profession, the ABA works to improve the administration of justice, promotes programs that assist lawyers and judges in their work, accredits law schools, provides continuing legal education, and works to build public understanding around the world of the importance of the rule of law.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">- 30 -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abanow.org/2011/07/aba-urges-supreme-court-to-find-right-to-effective-assistance-of-counsel-at-the-criminal-plea-stage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Cannot Cut Justice,&#8221; American Bar Association Warns</title>
		<link>http://www.abanow.org/2011/06/%e2%80%9ccannot-cut-justice-american-bar-association-warns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.abanow.org/2011/06/%e2%80%9ccannot-cut-justice-american-bar-association-warns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California State Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edmund Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Funding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abanow.org/?p=17783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ABA is speaking out strongly against proposed additional cuts to the California courts budget, calling them “disastrous.” In a letter sent yesterday to Gov. Edmund (“Jerry”) Brown and leaders of the California State Assembly, American Bar Association President Stephen N. Zack said the following: “In the face of crisis, some facts become clearer than ever. One such fact is that you cannot —and must not — cut justice any further.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a letter sent yesterday to Gov. Edmund (“Jerry”) Brown and leaders of the California State Assembly, American Bar Association President Stephen N. Zack said the following:</p>
<p>“In the face of crisis, some facts become clearer than ever. One such fact is that you cannot —and must not — cut justice any further.</p>
<p>We recognize that the state of California is facing enormous, difficult and momentous budget decisions. But the recent attempt to slash yet another $150 million from the state courts budget is disastrous. One example is the impact the proposed cut would have on the San Francisco Superior Court alone. How is a court supposed to operate after losing nearly half its staff to layoffs?</p>
<p>We know this is unacceptable to you, and to everyone who shares a belief in individual rights, liberty and fairness. The American Bar Association praises your veto of the budget proposal containing these cuts. We urge all California leaders to come together for better solutions and long-term reform.</p>
<p>The ABA strongly supports state adoption of judicial branch budgeting that ensures adequate, stable, long-term funding of the courts in <em>all </em>economic conditions. This issue is so critical that the ABA this year formed a Task Force on Preservation of the Justice System, chaired by David Boies and Theodore B. Olson. The association is prepared to provide any appropriate help in addressing this crisis. And we urge you in the strongest terms possible to not allow any further budgetary attacks on the state’s already besieged system of justice.</p>
<p>Court underfunding results in delays and the elimination of services that shred the fundamental American promise of <span style="text-decoration: underline;">equal justice under law</span>. Protecting courts protects the people and our constitutional democracy. We are all committed to that.“</p>
<p>The letter is posted <a title="Stephen Zack letter to California Governor Brown" href="http://www.abanow.org/wordpress/wp-content/files_flutter/1308946251zack_letter_to_brown_062311.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>President Zack personally takes his case to California in a speech before the Commonwealth Club on July 14. Additional background or interviews available upon request.</p>
<p><em> </em>With nearly 400,000 members, the American Bar Association is the largest voluntary professional membership organization in the world.  As the national voice of the legal profession, the ABA works to improve the administration of justice, promotes programs that assist lawyers and judges in their work, accredits law schools, provides continuing legal education, and works to build public understanding around the world of the importance of the rule of law.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">- 30 -</p>
<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abanow.org/2011/06/%e2%80%9ccannot-cut-justice-american-bar-association-warns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20 Proposals and Other Resources Available to Media</title>
		<link>http://www.abanow.org/2011/05/aba-commission-on-ethics-2020-proposals-and-other-resources-available-to-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.abanow.org/2011/05/aba-commission-on-ethics-2020-proposals-and-other-resources-available-to-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 20:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abanow.org/?p=16973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON, D.C., May 25, 2011 – The American Bar Association Commission on Ethics 20/20 has released for comment initial proposals suggesting amendments to several association policies and to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, as the commission reviews the U.S. system of lawyer regulation in the context of advances in technology and global legal practice developments.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON, D.C., May 25, 2011 – The <a href="http://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/aba_commission_on_ethics_20_20.html">American Bar Association Commission on Ethics 20/20</a> has released for comment initial proposals suggesting amendments to several association policies and to the <a href="http://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct.html">ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct</a>, as the commission reviews the U.S. system of lawyer regulation in the context of advances in technology and global legal practice developments.</p>
<p>Proposed amendments now available for comment relate to the following issues:</p>
<ul>
<li>The growing number of lawyers and law firms that outsource legal and nonlegal work, both domestically and internationally;</li>
<li>Lawyers’ growing use of technology, especially technology that stores or transmits confidential information; and</li>
<li>Foreign lawyers providing legal services in the United States.</li>
</ul>
<p>Information about the Commission on Ethics 20/20, its mission and its work are available <a href="../../2011/05/commission-on-ethics-2020-reporter-resources/">here</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">- 30 -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abanow.org/2011/05/aba-commission-on-ethics-2020-proposals-and-other-resources-available-to-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Increase Public Safety While Reducing Federal Deficit, Says ABA on Criminal Justice Policies</title>
		<link>http://www.abanow.org/2011/05/increase-public-safety-while-reducing-federal-deficit-says-aba-on-criminal-justice-policies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.abanow.org/2011/05/increase-public-safety-while-reducing-federal-deficit-says-aba-on-criminal-justice-policies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 20:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Alerts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abanow.org/?p=16876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON, D.C., May 23, 2011 – In letters sent today to the chairs and ranking members of the Senate and House Committees on the Budget, Appropriations and Judiciary, American Bar Association President Stephen N. Zack called for consideration at the federal level of bipartisan measures that have already seen success in the area of criminal justice policy at the state level.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON, D.C., May 23, 2011 – In letters sent today to the chairs and ranking members of the Senate and House Committees on the Budget, Appropriations and Judiciary, American Bar Association President Stephen N. Zack called for consideration at the federal level of bipartisan measures that have already seen success in the area of criminal justice policy at the state level.</p>
<p>The ABA recommended many policies designed to increase public safety while reducing the federal deficit: expanding the use of probation and expungement of criminal convictions for low-level offenders; instituting a review process to accelerate supervised release eligibility; making retroactive congressional reforms to crack cocaine sentencing; enhancing elderly nonviolent offender early release programs; expanding time credits for good behavior; and restoring proportionality to drug sentencing.</p>
<p>Zack wrote, “There is a growing recognition that our criminal justice system — like other government systems — must be based on what actually works, meet clear performance measures and withstand fiscal scrutiny of cost-benefit analysis.”</p>
<p>The letter sent to Sens. Kent Conrad, Jeff Sessions, Daniel K. Inouye, Thad Cochran, Patrick J. Leahy and Charles Grassley can be found <a href="http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/uncategorized/2011/2011may23_cjfederalsavingss_l.authcheckdam.pdf">here</a>. The letter sent to Reps. Paul Ryan, Chris Van Hollen, Harold Rogers, Norm Dicks, Lamar Smith and John Conyers can be found <a href="http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/uncategorized/2011/2011may23_cjfederalsavingsh_l.authcheckdam.pdf">here</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">- 30 -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abanow.org/2011/05/increase-public-safety-while-reducing-federal-deficit-says-aba-on-criminal-justice-policies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABA Urges Congress to Help Overburdened Immigration Court System</title>
		<link>http://www.abanow.org/2011/05/aba-urges-congress-to-help-overburdened-immigration-court-system/</link>
		<comments>http://www.abanow.org/2011/05/aba-urges-congress-to-help-overburdened-immigration-court-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 18:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commission on Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Grisez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Commission on the Judiciary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abanow.org/?p=16598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON, D.C., May 18, 2011 — In testimony delivered to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Karen Grisez, chair of the American Bar Association Commission on Immigration, expressed serious concerns with the growing burden on immigration courts to keep up with expanded immigration enforcement activity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON, D.C., May 18, 2011 — In testimony delivered to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Karen Grisez, chair of the American Bar Association Commission on Immigration, expressed serious concerns with the growing burden on immigration courts to keep up with expanded immigration enforcement activity.</p>
<p>“Our immigration system is in crisis, overburdened and under-resourced, leading to the frustration of those responsible for its administration and endangering due process for those who appear before it,” said Grisez in her written testimony.</p>
<p>The number of noncitizens removed from the United States has increased more than 450 percent in the past dozen years &#8212; from 69,680 removed in fiscal year 1996 to 393,289 removed in fiscal year 2009. In recent years, immigration detainees have represented the fastest growing segment of the U.S. incarcerated population.</p>
<p>Grisez, who is Special Counsel for Public Service at the law firm of Fried, Frank, Harris, Schriver and Jacobson LLP, offered several recommendations from the ABA to alleviate pressure on immigration courts and enhance confidence in the outcome of adjudications:</p>
<ul>
<li>Hire additional immigration judges to bring caseloads down to around 700 cases per judge annually (down from approximately 1,145 cases recently) and more law clerks to allow for one per judge (on average there is only one law clerk per four immigration judges).</li>
<li>Expand noncitizen access to legal counsel, which would avoid procedural snags and excessive appeals that arise when people represent themselves instead of hiring a lawyer.  Legal representation ensures cases are decided on their merits instead of how well an individual can navigate the complicated legal process.</li>
<li>The ABA urges the Department of Homeland Security to focus on noncitizens that pose a risk to our national security and public safety.  DHS should prioritize cases where noncitizens are likely to be removed, and use prosecutorial discretion when individuals are not likely to be removed.</li>
<li>Immigration courts should hold pre-hearing conferences to speed subsequent proceedings.  Pre-hearing conferences are also a good opportunity to dispose of cases where an individual would clearly be removed or released.</li>
<li>Allow asylum officers, rather than courts, to handle claims raised as a defense to expedited removal, and also remove the requirement that asylum seekers file their claim within one year of arrival in the U.S.  Both recommendations would reduce immigration court caseloads.</li>
</ul>
<p>These and additional recommendations are found in the Commission on Immigration’s comprehensive analysis of the immigration court system, <em><a href="http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/immigration/coi_executive_summary.authcheckdam.pdf">Reforming the Immigration System: Proposals to Promote Independence, Fairness, Efficiency, and Professionalism in the Adjudication of Removal Cases</a></em>.</p>
<p><em>A copy of the testimony is available <a href="http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/uncategorized/2011/2011may18_grisezs_t.authcheckdam.pdf">here</a>.</em></p>
<p>With  nearly 400,000 members, the American Bar Association is the largest  voluntary professional membership organization in the world.  As the  national voice of the legal profession, the ABA works to improve the  administration of justice, promotes programs that assist lawyers and  judges in their work, accredits law schools, provides continuing legal  education, and works to build public understanding around the world of  the importance of the rule of law.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">- 30 -</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p><em><strong>Media Contact:</strong> Rob Boisseau (202-662-1093/Robert.Boisseau@americanbar.org)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abanow.org/2011/05/aba-urges-congress-to-help-overburdened-immigration-court-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABA Files Amicus Brief on Lawyer Duty for Competent Representation in Missouri Public Defender Commission Case</title>
		<link>http://www.abanow.org/2011/05/aba-files-amicus-brief-on-lawyer-duty-for-competent-representation-in-missouri-public-defender-commission-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.abanow.org/2011/05/aba-files-amicus-brief-on-lawyer-duty-for-competent-representation-in-missouri-public-defender-commission-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 18:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Alerts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abanow.org/?p=16485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CHICAGO, May 13, 2011 – The American Bar Association today filed an amicus curiae brief in a case before the Supreme Court of Missouri, asking that the court consider lawyers’ ethical and professional obligations to their clients when resolving whether the state’s public defender office can limit the office’s availability to accept new cases.  The brief filed in State Ex Rel. Missouri Public Defender Commission, J. Marty Robinson &#38; Rod Hackathorn v. The Hon. John S. Waters and the Honorable Mark Orr, asserts that appropriate weight must be given to the ethical and professional obligations set forth in the Rules Regulating the Missouri Bar and the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, under which all lawyers — including public defenders — must  provide diligent and competent representation to each of their clients, and cannot take on new representations, or must withdraw from existing representations, if a new representation would result in a violation of those rules.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHICAGO, May 13, 2011 – The American Bar Association today filed an amicus curiae brief in a case before the Supreme Court of Missouri, asking that the court consider lawyers’ ethical and professional obligations to their clients when resolving whether the state’s public defender office can limit the office’s availability to accept new cases.  The brief filed in <em>State Ex Rel. Missouri Public Defender Commission, J. Marty Robinson &amp; Rod Hackathorn v. The Hon. John S. Waters and the Honorable Mark Orr, </em>asserts that appropriate weight must be given to the ethical and professional obligations set forth in the Rules Regulating the Missouri Bar and the <a href="http://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct.html">ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct</a>, under which all lawyers — including public defenders — must  provide diligent and competent representation to each of their clients, and cannot take on new representations, or must withdraw from existing representations, if a new representation would result in a violation of those rules.</p>
<p>A copy of the ABA brief is available <a title="Amicus Brief - Robinson/Hackathorn v. Waters/Orr" href="http://www.abanow.org/wordpress/wp-content/files_flutter/1305296616robinsonhackathorn_v_watersorr.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">- 30 -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abanow.org/2011/05/aba-files-amicus-brief-on-lawyer-duty-for-competent-representation-in-missouri-public-defender-commission-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Bar Association Asks Supreme Court to Consider Attorney-Client Relationship When Grand Jury Subpoenas are Served on Lawyers</title>
		<link>http://www.abanow.org/2011/04/american-bar-association-asks-supreme-court-to-consider-attorney-client-relationship-when-grand-jury-subpoenas-are-served-on-lawyers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.abanow.org/2011/04/american-bar-association-asks-supreme-court-to-consider-attorney-client-relationship-when-grand-jury-subpoenas-are-served-on-lawyers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Case v. United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abanow.org/?p=16103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CHICAGO, April 20, 2011 — The American Bar Association today filed an amicus curiae brief with the Supreme Court of the United States in support of the petitioner’s request for a writ of certiorari in White &#38; Case LLP v. U.S. The case involves a grand jury subpoena for client materials that was served on the law firm White &#38; Case LLP, and whether the subpoena should trump a civil protective order issued in the underlying civil case.  The ABA requests that certiorari be granted based on the importance of the issue to the attorney-client relationship and on the need for Supreme Court guidance because of a three-way split on the issue among the circuit courts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHICAGO, April 20, 2011 —<strong> </strong>The American Bar Association today filed an <em>amicus curiae</em> brief with the Supreme Court of the United States in support of the petitioner’s request for a writ of certiorari in <em>White &amp; Case LLP v. U.S.</em> The case involves a grand jury subpoena for client materials that was served on the law firm White &amp; Case LLP, and whether the subpoena should trump a civil protective order issued in the underlying civil case.  The ABA requests that certiorari be granted based on the importance of the issue to the attorney-client relationship and on the need for Supreme Court guidance because of a three-way split on the issue among the circuit courts.</p>
<p>The ABA believes that <em>per se</em> enforcement of subpoenas to lawyers for client materials merits review by the court, citing the potential to undermine the free flow of information essential to the attorney-client relationship.  In addition, the ABA requests a uniform rule for the circuit courts, so that lawyers and their clients can expect consistency when subpoena enforcement issues arise.</p>
<p>A copy of the ABA brief is available <a title="Amicus Brief - White Case v. United States" href="http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/amicus/white_case_v_united_states.authcheckdam.pdf">here</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">- 30 -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abanow.org/2011/04/american-bar-association-asks-supreme-court-to-consider-attorney-client-relationship-when-grand-jury-subpoenas-are-served-on-lawyers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

